Canadian Immigration Law Blog

Award-Winning Canadian Immigration and Refugee Law and Commentary Blog

Blog Posts

Three Useful Canadian Immigration Lessons from the New BC PNP Skills Immigration Guide

Introduction

Now a couple weeks old, the BC PNP’s 2016 offerings for its Skills Immigration Programs have drastically changed the way the bulk of nominations for permanent residence occur in the Province of British Columbia.

Taking lessons from Immigration, Refugee and Citizenship Canada (“IRCC”)’s  Express Entry program and following the trend of many provinces towards an electronic application management system, BC PNP has also rolled out it’s own electronic points-based system.

This system requires that the Applicant first create a profile demonstrating they meet requirements. They will be awarded an initial score and then based on their score may automatically be eligible for selection depending on their category of application. Those who do not meet the score requirements for guaranteed invitation can stay in the pool for up to a year and may be issued a nomination if the points total goes down to the score they hold.

I won’t go into the finite details of the program. My colleague, Steven Meurrens has written an excellent post introducing the new program offerings and operation. Please see his post here.

What I want to do in this post is read between the lines a bit to see what current legal issues and policy issues we can extract from the BC PNP’s Skills Immigration and Express Entry BC Program Guide. I believe the guide really, and almost accidentally, susses out some major issues currently affecting those pursuing Canadian immigration options through employment.

For those following at home/work here is a copy of the Program Guide for your viewing pleasure here. 

A brief note that I will not be making any normative judgments or criticisms about the BC PNP program in this piece. First, I believe it is much too early to critique something that has not yet been fully tested in operation. Second, I am generally a big fan of the overall concept of using technology to speed up, enhance, and organize the immigration process for applicants. I am a big fan of the BC PNP’s dedication and initiative to eliminating processing times and reducing inventory in several of their previously oversubscribed programs. 

So without further ado, here we go:

Lesson 1: BC PNP Provides a Great Guide to Job/Career Planning for Potential Permanent Residents

Through the introduction of bonus points, the BC PNP Skills Immigration process awards additional ten (10) points to those working in jobs considered Top 100 in terms of the BC Labour Market Outlook from 2014-2024. You can read the entire report here. 

Below are screenshots of the relevant tables. showing the NOC 0, A, B, and C positions.

Top 100 jobs Top 100 jobs 2Top 100 jobs 3

This guide would be very useful for an international student or a foreign national near graduation from a B.C. high school to look at possible career paths. For each of these occupations, there may be educational requirements as well, so it is important to corresponding look at the National Occupation Classification code (corresponding to the code in the far right columns of the above chart).

Lesson 2: BC PNP Suggests that Tax/Employer/Employee Issues Will Continue to Be Immigration Barriers

a) Permanent Establishment Definition Creates Possible Exceptions to Full-Time Employee Requirement

One of the requirements for an employer seeking to use the BC PNP program is that the employer must be “permanently established in B.C. as defined by the federal Income Tax Act.” 

There is also a softer requirement that the Employer have at least five indeterminate, full-time employees (or full-time equivalents) if the employer is located within Metro Vancouver or at least three indeterminate, full-time employees (or full-time equivalents) in B.C. if they are located outside Metro Vancouver. However, this is discretionary and BC PNP may take into account a compelling business case if the nomination will generate economic benefit to B.C.

The permanent establishment angle is quite interesting and could give way to unique immigration options. Canada Revenue Agency, interpreting S. 400(1) of the Income Tax Act  does not actually require that that the company must have a fixed place of business in the province. 

In fact, if the corporation caries on business through an employee or agent it could be considered a permanent establishment if the employee or agent either:

  1. “has general authority to contract for the corporation;” or
  2. “has stock of merchandise owned by the corporation from which the employee or agent regularly fills orders received.”

The BC PNP does require that the Employer is:

  1. incorporated or extra-provincially registered or
  2. registered as a limited liability partnership in B.C. or
  3.  be an eligible public sector or non-profit employer.

According to the CRA a corporation is deemed to have permanent establishment in B.C., if the place designated in its incorporation documents or bylaw as its head office or registered office is in B.C.

My reading of the above, in addition to the fact there is no parallel requirement that the eligible Employer must be incorporated or  must be operational for a certain period of time, is that a new/young start-up company, even unincorporated and without a B.C. operating address, may have options to support a foreign worker’s nomination through BC PNP Skills Immigration.

Given the layer of discretion inherent in the language and BC PNP’s policy, it will be interesting to see how they is used and how BC PNP program officers address this possible pathway to permanent residency.

b) No Contractors and Unexplained Wages

BC PNP establishes several times in the Skills Immigration Guide that only employees qualify for nomination and that independent contractors are not considered indeterminate employees. This could also raise tax issues, as I am aware that recently there has been a hiring practice, particularly in smaller companies/start-ups, to hire what should be employees as contractors instead.

This becomes an issue even prior to creation of the offer of employment to support a potential nomination. BC PNP has also set out in its calculation of the “Minimum Income Requirement” for BC PNP registration that Family Income does not include bonuses, commissions, or profit sharing distributions. Even for those who currently hold valid work permits (many times, post-graduate work permits where there is much flexibility in hiring and wage), applicants must “demonstrate a history of earning the offered wage and a history of meeting minimum income requirements prior to submitting a registration and/or application to the BC PNP. This requirement is even more specific for the Entry level and Semi-Skilled Applicants program – which requires nine full months of evidence (likely through pay stubs).

This will be an important consideration particularly for those applicants who will be relying on international work experience, often times work within a family company, prior to applying to the BC PNP Skills Immigration program. Many times, the arrangements in these companies is very loose, not adequately recorded, and involves some sort of profit/share scenario. Individuals with immigration ambitions through skilled worker programs would be wise to seek legal counsel prior to gaining the requisite work experience used to qualify for BC PNP Skills Immigration.

 

3. Education, Language (but not Age) are Increasingly Important and Determinative Factors for Permanent Residency

The big change brought in through the new BC Skills Immigration program offerings, independent of the federal requirements already explicit in the Express Entry BC Skills Immigration programs. is that there are now language requirements for NOC B, C, D, positions and that Language now represents 30 out of the 200 possible points on the scoring system for all applicants.

My understanding that for NOC 0 and A occupations, there is no hard requirement to submit language tests but that failure to do so would cost the applicant 30 points. Furthermore, there is an added discretionary risk – both at the pre-nomination level and also at the PR Application level that an Officer (either BC PNP or IRCC) may determine an individual without requisite English skills could not perform the requirements job. Language, for all intents and purposes, is now acting as an important hurdle that several applicants will have to jump.

Second, education is becoming scrutinized more carefully. Federally, the government has been implementing several efforts relating to compliance – particularly in the field of individuals who are not actively pursuing studies while holding a study permit (now a ground for removal from Canada).

Provincially, you can see the BC PNP suggest that education, particularly diplomas and certificates that qualify one for the International Graduates stream, will be scrutinized more carefully.

They write in their guide:

Diplomas and Certificates

The bold emphasizes that only public post-secondary institutions support a nomination through the International Graduates program though there are hundred eligible DLIs (mostly private) that support study permits.

Below are a list of the 21 public post-secondary institutions that could support International Graduates and I would suggest simultaneously would be very popular for students immigrating to Canada with permanent resident ambitions:

21 Public Institutions

(Source: http://www.aved.gov.bc.ca/datawarehouse/documents/headcount.pdf)

Conclusion

The BC PNP Skills Immigration program guide, more than just a document providing information, really represents a window into the challenges and barriers all potential temporary and economic immigrants to Canada are facing. Issues such as hire-ability, employment, tax, language, and education all play a prominent role in the BC PNP Skills Immigration program and will continue to for most provincial and federal economic immigration programs down the road.

Read More »

Don’t Shoot the Airline Company- CBSA’s IAPI is the other side of the eTA

155278373 aircraft stock

There is no doubt that Canada’s electronic Travel Authorization (“eTA”) regime, set to go into full legal effect  a little over a month from now, will be disruptive to the process of travelling to Canada.

As I have covered in an earlier blog on the topic, the eTA will create several consequences for those seeking entry by air into Canada. Some of the expected follow out could include permanent residents being trapped outside Canada with expired cards, Canadian dual citizens lacking proper documentation unable to fly home, and foreign nationals being unable to board planes to Canada. It will also have spillovers to those seeking to enter by land via private vehicle. One immigration lawyer suggested jokingly that a local U.S. land border was likely to get very busy due to the number of individuals forced to drive across in private vehicle in order to return to Canada. Individuals who drive by private vehicle are not under a  requirement to produce a valid PR card upon entry.

This all begs a question.  How will the eTA be enforced from the other side – by airlines companies? To look more closely we need to study Canada Border Services Agency (“CBSA”) Interactive Advanced Passenger Information (“IAPI”) system and the increased role airline companies now play as the front line to screen out individuals flying to Canada with improper/expired documents.

IAPI

Prior to the eTA, individuals with expired permanent resident cards has several options. One of them (for individuals who did hold travel documents), was to present a visa-exempt passport in order to get past airlines and hop  the plane. Upon arrival they would then attempt to enter Canada on the basis of the expired PR card and a confirmation of permanent residence. For many  passengers this worked. Very little was done to keep the individual off the plane and little was enquired of the passenger’s immigration status.

IAPI changes that by requiring that “pre-departure traveller and flight data to be submitted by commercial air carriers prior to an international flight’s departure for Canada.”

For all international flights for Canada, CBSA will both require the advanced passenger information and ultimately issue a board/no-board message for each passenger. This means that prior to the flight, CBSA will no whether an individual is required to have a valid travel document (eTA or visa), is a permanent resident, or a Citizen. They will also be able to track if the individual is subject to a removal order or an Authority for Negative Discretion (“AND”).

The technical nature of the IAPI system is at first glance very confusing and complex. I expect that the airline companies that already have state of the art IT  will likely try and figure out internal systems to facilitate the provision of passenger information to CBSA.

Exit Controls Coming Soon.

The next major development will be the implementation of exit controls, which to my best estimate will occur sometime in early-mid 2017. From my review of CBSA briefing material for airline companies, much of the technical infrastructure is in place for this already. Once exit controls get rolled out, I think we can see integration with both PR and Canadian passports as well allowing the CBSA to better track and record the entries and exits of all air and land border.

For more information about the eTA, IAPI, and how it may affect your travel plans feel free to email me at will.tao@larlee.com

Read More »

New LMIA Exemption for Film/TV Production Workers and the Pathway to Permanent Residency

2940164-Blank-film-strip-Stock-Photo-film-roll-reel

As of February 17, 2016 CIC (now “IRCC”) will open up a new exemption to the Labour Market Impact Assessment (“LMIA”) requirement which should open up Canada’s television and film production industry to select temporary foreign workers (“TFWs”).

It appears from the program delivery instruction provided by IRCC (here) that this exemption is aimed at bigger name productions.  These are as the instructions put it “high value TV and film productions” that are “considered to create and maintain significant economic benefits and opportunities for Canadians and permanent residents.”

Importantly, and stepping outside the restrictive barriers that were previously provided by co-production treaty agreements, these films can be both foreign or Canadian and there is no requirement as to the portion which the TV or film is actually filmed in Canada. The workers are expected to be high wage, which in British Columbia is defined as earning more than $22/hr.

There appear to be two major stakeholders that will essentially define the success for the TFW’s work permit application on the basis of this LMIA exemption – the production company and the union/guild that the TFW is part of.

The production companies will need to provide a letter of support, setting out information about the production, shooting location, and a confirmation that the individual and position are vital to the production. They will need to detail the significant economic benefit to Canada of the TV or film production itself – including the number of Canadian jobs created, the budget spent in Canada, and also a statement confirming that the project satisfies the criteria for federal/provincial/territorial tax credits for funding.

The union/guild will similarly need to provide  a letter describing the union guild, providing information about the production, the name of the applicant, and a statement confirming that the union is of the view that the work being performed is subject to a collective agreement and that they have no objection to the work by the Temporary Foreign Worker.

IRCC states that the work permit validity will be the earlier of the end of the expected production (give or take additional time granted by immigration officers for re-entry/re-filming) or the expiry of the Applicant’s travel document (i.e. passport).

Planning the Pathway to Permanent Residence

From my initial research and discussion with unions and individuals in the industry, for most TV and film crew members who want to have a longer-term establishment in the Canadian job market, permanent residency will eventually be an important step.  Hiring in TV and film in Canada is highly dependent on the backend tax credits and benefits the producer can expect to receive. Those credits and benefits are often dependent on the residency and status of the crew involved in the production.

That being said, it is very possible to transfer from a TFW to permanent residency while preserving one’s working career in TV and film in Canada. This is important as I understand the film and tv industry to be unforgiving to employment gaps that can often be created through immigration processes.

I think the following are useful factors to note.

Contrary to public opinion, unions and guilds do not all have Canadian permanent resident requirements and those that do, often have soft requirements. Particularly where the union is in high demand for members and have a shortage in a specific position, they may be able to bend the requirements. I know that some unions operate on a tax resident or demonstrated permanent intention threshold for membership rather than a strict legal status requirement. Unions appear more focused on the Applicant’s background and expertise in the particular role they are seeking membership in (subject to any collective agreement stating otherwise).

With union membership secured, the question then becomes finding jobs with a tax credit/funded position. Again, it is not true that all workers must necessarily be Canadian permanent residents of citizens to qualify for tax credits. For example, Canadian producers can claim Film Incentive B.C. (“FIBC”) tax credits for what is called B.C. Labour. B.C. Labour is defined strictly in terms of tax, rather than legal residency.

BC LabourJPG

“The individual must be resident in BC and ordinarily resident in Cnaada as of 31 December of the year preceding the end of the fiscal year for which the tax credit is being claimed… “Paying tax in BC in the previous calendar year is a good indicator but is not necessarily the determining factor that the individual is a resident of BC for the purposes of the tax credit”

However, for several of the federal tax credits such as the Canadian Audio-Visual Certification Office (CAVCO)’s Canadian Film or Video Production Tax Credit (CPTC), a strict legal definition of Canadian residency  is adopted. CPTC operates on a detailed point system (that I won’t get into in this post), but it requires that certain key positions are filled by Canadian permanent residents or citizens  in order for credits to be granted.

CAVCO key personnel

With respect to producer-related or key creative personnel for a production, the term “Canadian” is defined as a person who is, at all relevant times, a Canadian citizen as defined in the Citizenship Act, or a permanent resident as defined in the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. The person must be Canadian during the entire time he or she performs any duties in relation to the production.

I’m a TFW. Where is the starting point?

For a foreign national looking to come to Canada to work in TV and Film Production with a future intention to be a permanent resident, it may be useful to take advantage of the new LMIA exemption. Work experience in Canada will often times begin the immigration process  by providing  temporary Canadian work experience that will directly assist or springboard into options for permanent residency. For example, LMIA-exempt work permit holders have various options to obtain LMIAs in support for permanent residency, Provincial Nominations, and/or may even be able to qualify for permanent residence solely on the basis of their foreign (and now Canadian) work experience.

Realistically, this LMIA exemption appears to be limited to major productions with significant Canadian benefit in terms of jobs and expected revenue. For those currently working in smaller/non-funded productions, and where the union process and the type of productions are not available, it may be useful to use the wonderful film/media education available in Canada as a bridge.

Ultimately, the complexity of issues such as tax, funding, and unions certainly will create the need for unique immigration and work permit strategies for TV and film workers hoping to seek long-term employer and residency in Canada.

Read More »

CIW Post #3 – Not All Trade Agreements Treat Professionals the Same

We’re extending the CIW (Corporate Immigration Week) to the end of the month! 

R. 204(a), of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (“IRPR”)  provide certain Professionals exemptions from the onerous Labour Market Impact Assessment (“LMIA”) process.

Whether a Professional qualifies depends on the specific Trade Agreement Canada has entered into and the terms of the Trade Agreement. Each Trade Agreement has it’s own unique textual nuance that can have quite dramatic effects in whether the exemption can practically apply.

In this piece, we will look at the North-American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”), Canada-Columbia Free Trade Agreement (“CCFTA”), Canada-Korea Free Trade Agreement (“CKFTA”), and the soon-to-be signed/may be ratified Trans-Pacific Partnership (“TPP”).

NAFTA

Under NAFTA, a party shall grant temporary entry to a business person seeking to engage in a business activity at a professional level in a profession set out in Appendix 1603.D.1. Appendix 1603.D.1 contains around 63 different professions/subprofessions that qualify.  Among the professions, lawyers are included. The Minimum Education Requirements and Alternative Credentials are listed in the chart – most requiring a Baccalaureate or Licenciatura Degree; or a post-secondary diploma/professional license depending on the profession.

It is also important to note that NAFTA does not specifically cover the spouses of Professionals but spouses of NAFTA Professionals, who by nature of their positions are in a Skilled National Occupation Classification (“NOC”) Code under NOC 0,A,B, are eligible for a open-work permits pursuant to R. 205(c)(ii), code C41.

CCFTA

Under the CCFTA, professionals are defined as follows:

professional means a national of a Party who is engaged in a specialty occupation requiring:

(a) theoretical and practical application of a body of specialized knowledge and the appropriate certification/license to practice; and

(b) attainment of a post-secondary degree in the specialty requiring four or more years of study, as a minimum for entry into the occupation;

CCFTA includes a list in Appendix 1203.D of the 19 occupations that are not included as professionals under the agreement. Several social sciences professions, in particular judges, lawyers, and notaries are excluded.

What sets the CCFTA apart is a seemingly minor footnote detail. It states under footnote 2 (attached to the definition of professional).

In the case of Canada, these requirements are defined in the NOC.

Unlike NAFTA, the CCFTA does not contain a table list of minimum educational requirements and alternative credentials. A CCFTA professional must meet and is guided by the NOC requirement.

For example, for Civil Engineers (NOC 2131) and Computer Engineers (NOC 2147), the NOC requires the following:

  • Licensing by a provincial or territorial association of professional engineers is required to approve engineering drawings and reports and to practise as a Professional Engineer (P.Eng.).

The contrast between CCFTA and NAFTA is strong in the sense that a Bachelors degree appears all that is needed for NAFTA’s qualifications while a provincial license appears necessary under the CCFTA for several required duties.

It is to be noted that the CCFTA does create an specific exemption (T25) for spouses of successful CCFTA work permit applicants, allowing them to obtain open work permits.

CKFTA

The CKFTA provides yet another different classification of professional. The CKFTA provides one general definition but also two-subcategories.

The general definition is:

professional means a national of a Party who is engaged in a specialty occupation as stated in Appendix 12-A-2 who is not engaged in the field of education; and

Specifically, professionals are split into two categories.

contract service supplier means an employee of an enterprise who is engaged in the supply of a contracted service as an employee of an enterprise. That enterprise has a service contract from an enterprise of the other Party, who is the final consumer of the service which is supplied. The contract and duration of stay shall comply with the domestic law of the other Party;

independent professional means a self-employed professional who seeks to engage, as part of a service contract granted by an enterprise or a service consumer of the other Party, in an activity at a professional level, provided that the person possesses the necessary education, or satisfies accreditation or licensing requirements as stipulated for the profession;

IRCC clarifies how the two different professionals are to be assessed: 

Professionals (work permit required / LMIA exemption code T23)

The Canada-Korea FTA differentiates between two types of professional—the contract service supplier and the independent professional. Both must be requesting entry to provide a pre-arranged professional service and possess the necessary education, or satisfy accreditation or licensing requirements, as stipulated for the profession.

The following definitions apply:

  • contract service supplier means an employee of an enterprise who is engaged in the supply of a contracted service as an employee of an enterprise. That enterprise has a service contract from an enterprise of the other Party, who is the final consumer of the service which is supplied.
    • example: A Canadian high tech company contracts the services of a Korean firm to provide services in the field of engineering. An experienced software engineer employed by the Korean firm in Seoul seeks entry to Canada to provide the engineering services under the terms of the pre-arranged services contract.
  • independent professional means a self-employed professional who seeks to engage, as part of a service contract granted by an enterprise or a service consumer of the other Party, in an activity at a professional level.
    • example: A self-employed Korean management consultant seeks entry to Canada to provide services to a technology company under the terms of a pre-arranged contract.

Similar to the approach used in the NAFTA, the Canada-Korea FTA uses a positive listing of professionals (set out in Appendix 12-A-2), however, it is divided between Contract Service Suppliers and Independent Professionals, as coverage in each category differs.

This provision is quite unique as it suggests that a Korean national cannot be employed (as an employee) by the Canadian entity but rather either has to be an independent contractor OR an employee of the Korean entity that has contracted with a Canadian entity.

In effect, for several Koreans seeking to use this exemption as a temporary bridge to future permanent residency options and who may previously or continue to work for a Canadian employer, they would necessarily need to reformulate their employment contracts.

It is to be noted that CKFTA does create an exemption (T25)  for spouses of successful CKFTA work permit applicants, allowing them to obtain open work permits.

TPP

Canada’s commitments under the TPP with respect to Professionals shows a tightening up of the category. The scope of the TPP’s extension of R.204(a) LMIA exempt work permits is enormous.  It covers countries including Australia, Brunei, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, and Peru . While there are several industry restrictions for each of these countries, I expect the effect of TPP on the foreign worker landscape in Canada will still be pronounced.

For example, an Australian national who obtains a Canadian Bachelors degree graduating at the age of 21 arguably could theoretically (assuming no application of the four-year cap) apply for a post-graduate work permit (up to 3 yrs),  the working holiday/young professionals plus international co-op (up to 3 years), and the TPP (1 year initially) for a combined 7-years of employment in Canada without the need for a LMIA or an Application for Permanent Residency.

Understandably, the restrictions on the professionals are tighter than they are for NAFTA, CCFTA, and the CKFTA aookucabts. For starters, the initial  work permit is to be issued for one rather than two years. Importantly, the definition of professional is also stricter:

professionals means business persons engaged in a specialty occupation requiring:

  • (a) theoretical and practical application of a body of specialized knowledge; and
  • (b) a post-secondary degree of four or more years of study, unless otherwise provided in this schedule, and any additional requirement defined in the National Occupation Classification, and
  • (c) two years of paid work experience in the sector of activity of the contract, and
  • (d) remuneration at a level commensurate with other similarly-qualified professionals within the industry in the region where the work is performed. Such remuneration shall be deemed to not include non-monetary elements such as, inter alia, housing costs and travel expenses.

In addition to the CCFTA’s requirement that the NOC requirements also be met. There is also a requirement for two years of paid work experience in the sector and remuneration at a commensurate level (which I expect  would be prevailing wage as per Job Bank).  This exemption will be very difficult for a transitioning post-graduate work permit holder to meet so expect it mainly to be used for senior employees/contractors unless the provision changes.

Conclusion

NAFTA, CCFTA, CKFTA, and the pending TPP all provide very interesting insight into the nuances but important differences in each Trade Agreement and how they affect immigration options.

I would be happy to assist any individual from any of the Trade Agreement countries in figuring out how an LMIA exemption can be used for them either in a primary or secondary role to support work/future permanent residency ambitions in Canada.

Read More »
About Us
Will Tao is an Award-Winning Canadian Immigration and Refugee Lawyer, Writer, and Policy Advisor based in Vancouver. Vancouver Immigration Blog is a public legal resource and social commentary.

Let’s Get in Touch

Translate »